Works across review routes.
Static HTML files are supported in PR reviews, branch/document reviews, and Draft Reviews.
Commentary opens .html and .htm files in the same document-first workspace as Markdown, with sandboxed Preview, Raw source, outline navigation, and app-native comments.
Use HTML Review for document-like pages, generated reports, static docs output, and HTML briefs. Use Live Preview Reviews when the real running app and JavaScript behavior matter.
Preview mode shows the document-like page, Raw mode keeps source nearby, and the review shell explains when active page behavior was blocked for safety.
Open HTML where it already lives, review the rendered static page first, and use Raw mode only when source detail matters.
Start from a PR, branch, repository file, folder, or draft upload.
Review the static page in a sandboxed rendered mode.
Attach feedback to headings, sections, tables, cards, or figures.
Keep app-native threads primary and sync conservatively when provider mapping is reliable.
HTML Review is deliberately different from a live app preview. It gives static pages a reviewable document surface while blocking active behavior that would make review unsafe or misleading.
Static HTML files are supported in PR reviews, branch/document reviews, and Draft Reviews.
Scripts, event handlers, dangerous URLs, and active embeds are removed or blocked before review.
When a rendered HTML comment cannot be mapped to reliable provider source lines, the thread stays app-native or syncs with file-level context.
JavaScript execution, multi-page crawling, full browser fidelity, and visual HTML diff are outside this surface. Use Live Preview Reviews for opted-in running apps.
Open a Git-backed HTML page or create a private draft review from pasted or uploaded HTML.