Commentary
Commentary skill packs

Operate the review loop—and improve the work being reviewed.

Each plugin deliberately separates professional practice from Commentary mechanics. Practice skills remain useful before a connection exists; technical skills select one authoritative operating surface and preserve human-controlled decisions.

  • Three direct plugins
  • Technical and practice layers
  • CLI/MCP routing
  • Human-owned gates
Install

Add Commentary Review to Codex

Repository marketplace

Run both commands in Codex. The first adds the public skills repository; the second installs the review plugin.

Install the three Commentary plugins
codex plugin marketplace add commentary-dev/commentary-skills
codex plugin add commentary-review@commentary-skills
codex plugin add commentary-forms@commentary-skills
codex plugin add commentary-research@commentary-skills

Source and setup details are maintained in commentary-dev/commentary-skills. This is a repository marketplace integration, not a vendor marketplace listing.

Reference workflow

Connect the agent to a human-owned review loop.

The artifact, feedback, revision, and approval state stay explicit from start to finish.

  1. 01

    Use the practice skill to shape or critique the plan, form, or research study.

    Start from an explicit artifact and named owner.

  2. 02

    Choose the technical skill only when Commentary needs to create, retrieve, synchronize, render, or analyze an artifact.

    Keep the current state and unresolved context visible.

  3. 03

    Use CLI for local file-backed Draft or Brainstorming Reviews and MCP for remote/provider-backed review operations.

    Keep the current state and unresolved context visible.

  4. 04

    Never perform the same mutation through both interfaces.

    Keep the current state and unresolved context visible.

  5. 05

    Inspect authorship and gate state before resolving feedback or continuing downstream work.

    The next stage begins only after verification.

Review: critique the decision, then run the loop.

The review pack combines plan-review practice with Draft, Brainstorming, Live Preview, and provider-backed PR operations. It requires evidence from the actual environment and keeps approval human-owned.

  • review-agentic-plans
  • commentary-draft-review
  • commentary-brainstorm-review
  • commentary-pr-review
  • commentary-live-preview-review

Forms: design the questions, then implement the contract.

The Forms pack separates question and interaction quality from Form Contract creation, rendering, results, and adaptive per-respondent transitions. Adaptive sections belong to one submission instance and never silently mutate the shared source contract.

  • design-effective-forms
  • commentary-form-creation
  • commentary-form-rendering
  • commentary-form-results

Research: choose a defensible method, then operate the study.

The Research pack supports established UX research methods, including Nielsen Norman Group-style method selection and usability testing, without implying an official relationship. The workflow skill handles bounded study inspection, authoring, observation, evidence, and findings proposals.

  • design-product-research
  • commentary-research-workflow

GitHub Action: keep the rendered review visible on every revision.

The release package creates or updates one marker-backed pull-request summary. A scoped Commentary OAuth token can add the exact-revision gate state, but the Action never records a human decision or changes approval state.

  • Idempotent summary comment
  • Optional read-only gate check
  • GitHub remains authoritative
  • GitHub App Marketplace listing deferred

Suggested agent prompt

Human review, made explicit

Connect the agent. Keep approval human-owned.

Install Commentary's two-part review, Forms, and Research packs: practice skills improve the artifact, while technical skills operate Commentary through CLI, MCP, and SDK boundaries.