Commentary
Agentic Engineering Review

Read the work. Inspect the evidence. Decide the exact result.

Give substantial agent work a contextual walkthrough, exact source references and an honest evidence record. Keep human judgment attached to the revision people actually reviewed.

Launch candidate · independent qualification pending

Launch candidate · independent qualification pending. CP-039/040 will assess release claims and real human acceptance.

A readable explanation before a source dive.

Publish a multi-page review package with purpose, architecture, API behavior, changes and limitations. A Review Session composes exact Resource revisions into one reading context while original Resources and app-native threads remain authoritative.

Review the rendered narrative, open selected source or API mappings, then ask the assigned agent for a contextual investigation through the existing Interaction workflow. A source snapshot can be inspected without an active PR, within current repository access.

Evidence says what was observed.

An uploaded test report is an attributed report. Independently fetched provider CI evidence records the exact commit and narrow observation. Neither artifact existence nor a passing result proves all requirements or creates human acceptance.

Keep requirement, claim, source and evidence revisions explicit. Uncaptured source stays unavailable; missing authority fails closed. Investigation and correction history let reviewers understand what changed.

Human acceptance names an exact scope.

Request an eligible human Decision for the exact Session manifest and acceptance scope. Agents can request review and report fulfillment, but cannot impersonate the human decision.

Changed content or composition can make the earlier acceptance stale. Historical receipts remain readable, and current status asks for the next review instead of silently carrying an approval forward.

Different jobs, connected authority.

Use the smallest surface that answers the current question. Keep the reviewable artifact central.

How Commentary connects organization, review and decisions
JobSurfaceAuthority
Organize an initiativeOptional ProjectOriginal Resources keep their ownership, history and access.
Understand executionTyped Tracker and native viewsRecord status describes execution; review and acceptance are separate.
Review the resultRendered package and exact Review SessionApp-native threads remain the primary discussion record.
Assess a claimRequirements, reports and provider observationsReported and independently observed evidence retain distinct provenance.
Accept an outcomeExact human Interaction DecisionAn eligible human decides the immutable scope; revisions can make it stale.

Core organization is Free.

Projects, Trackers, native views, portability, package/session basics and agent access use the shared Free entitlements. Approved advanced renderer hosting, Git writeback, evidence and impact are usable Pro-preview during no billing.

GitHub writes require independent authorization. Azure writes are unsupported. Package and renderer content has separate trust tiers; bundles never receive app credentials.